Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#causality #statistics
Question
The main reason for moving from exchangeability (Assumption 2.1) to conditional exchangeability (Assumption 2.2) was that it seemed like a more realistic assumption. However, we often cannot know for certain if conditional exchangeability holds. There may be some [...] confounders that are not part of 𝑋 , meaning conditional exchangeability is violated. Fortunately, that is not a problem in randomized experiments
Answer
unobserved

Tags
#causality #statistics
Question
The main reason for moving from exchangeability (Assumption 2.1) to conditional exchangeability (Assumption 2.2) was that it seemed like a more realistic assumption. However, we often cannot know for certain if conditional exchangeability holds. There may be some [...] confounders that are not part of 𝑋 , meaning conditional exchangeability is violated. Fortunately, that is not a problem in randomized experiments
Answer
?

Tags
#causality #statistics
Question
The main reason for moving from exchangeability (Assumption 2.1) to conditional exchangeability (Assumption 2.2) was that it seemed like a more realistic assumption. However, we often cannot know for certain if conditional exchangeability holds. There may be some [...] confounders that are not part of 𝑋 , meaning conditional exchangeability is violated. Fortunately, that is not a problem in randomized experiments
Answer
unobserved
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
nditional exchangeability (Assumption 2.2) was that it seemed like a more realistic assumption. However, we often cannot know for certain if conditional exchangeability holds. There may be some <span>unobserved confounders that are not part of 𝑋 , meaning conditional exchangeability is violated. Fortunately, that is not a problem in randomized experiments <span>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

owner: crocodile - (no access) - Introduction_to_Causal_Inference-Nov19_2020-Neal.pdf, p19

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.