Edited, memorised or added to reading queue

on 21-Jul-2017 (Fri)

Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Click here to log in or create user.

Annotation 1637597449484

Toward a Philosophy of the Act reveals a young Bakhtin who is in the process of developing his moral philosophy by decentralizing the work of Kant. This text is one of Bakhtin’s early works concerning ethics and aesthetics and it is here that Bakhtin lays out three claims regarding the acknowledgment of the uniqueness of one’s participation in Being:

  1. I both actively and passively participate in Being.
  2. My uniqueness is given but it simultaneously exists only to the degree to which I actualize this uniqueness (in other words, it is in the performed act and deed that has yet to be achieved).
  3. Because I am actual and irreplaceable I must actualize my uniqueness
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Mikhail Bakhtin - Wikipedia
hy of the Act Bakhtin states the topics he intends to discuss. He outlines that the second part will deal with aesthetic activity and the ethics of artistic creation; the third with the ethics of politics; and the fourth with religion. [14] <span>Toward a Philosophy of the Act reveals a young Bakhtin who is in the process of developing his moral philosophy by decentralizing the work of Kant. This text is one of Bakhtin’s early works concerning ethics and aesthetics and it is here that Bakhtin lays out three claims regarding the acknowledgment of the uniqueness of one’s participation in Being: I both actively and passively participate in Being. My uniqueness is given but it simultaneously exists only to the degree to which I actualize this uniqueness (in other words, it is in the performed act and deed that has yet to be achieved). Because I am actual and irreplaceable I must actualize my uniqueness. Bakhtin further states: "It is in relation to the whole actual unity that my unique thought arises from my unique place in Being." [15] Bakhtin deals with the concept of m



Annotation 1637599546636

Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin ( / b ɑː k ˈ t iː n , b ɑː x -/ ;[2] Russian: Михаи́л Миха́йлович Бахти́н , pronounced [mʲɪxɐˈil mʲɪˈxajləvʲɪtɕ bɐxˈtʲin] ; 17 November [O.S. 5 November] 1895 – 7 March[3] 1975) was a Russian philosopher, literary critic, semiotician[4] and scholar who worked on literary theory, ethics, and the philosophy of language.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Mikhail Bakhtin - Wikipedia
olyphony Influences[show] Fyodor Dostoyevsky, F. F. Zelinsky, Immanuel Kant, Hermann Cohen, Ernst Cassirer, Max Scheler, Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche [1] Influenced[show] Julia Kristeva, Tzvetan Todorov <span>Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin (/bɑːkˈtiːn, bɑːx-/; [2] Russian: Михаи́л Миха́йлович Бахти́н, pronounced [mʲɪxɐˈil mʲɪˈxajləvʲɪtɕ bɐxˈtʲin]; 17 November [O.S. 5 November] 1895 – 7 March [3] 1975) was a Russian philosopher, literary critic, semiotician [4] and scholar who worked on literary theory, ethics, and the philosophy of language. His writings, on a variety of subjects, inspired scholars working in a number of different traditions (Marxism, semiotics, structuralism, religious criticism) and in disciplines as dive